Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRabinovich, Mikhail I.
dc.contributor.authorVarona Martínez, Pablo 
dc.contributor.authorSelverston, Allen I.
dc.contributor.authorAbarbanel, Henry D. I.
dc.contributor.otherUAM. Departamento de Ingeniería Informáticaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-28T17:19:49Z
dc.date.available2014-11-28T17:19:49Z
dc.date.issued2006-11-14
dc.identifier.citationReviews of Modern Physics 78.4 (2006): 1213-1265en_US
dc.identifier.issn0034-6861 (print)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1539-0756 (online)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10486/662721
dc.description.abstractDynamical modeling of neural systems and brain functions has a history of success over the last half century. This includes, for example, the explanation and prediction of some features of neural rhythmic behaviors. Many interesting dynamical models of learning and memory based on physiological experiments have been suggested over the last two decades. Dynamical models even of consciousness now exist. Usually these models and results are based on traditional approaches and paradigms of nonlinear dynamics including dynamical chaos. Neural systems are, however, an unusual subject for nonlinear dynamics for several reasons: (i) Even the simplest neural network, with only a few neurons and synaptic connections, has an enormous number of variables and control parameters. These make neural systems adaptive and flexible, and are critical to their biological function. (ii) In contrast to traditional physical systems described by well-known basic principles, first principles governing the dynamics of neural systems are unknown. (iii) Many different neural systems exhibit similar dynamics despite having different architectures and different levels of complexity. (iv) The network architecture and connection strengths are usually not known in detail and therefore the dynamical analysis must, in some sense, be probabilistic. (v) Since nervous systems are able to organize behavior based on sensory inputs, the dynamical modeling of these systems has to explain the transformation of temporal information into combinatorial or combinatorial-temporal codes, and vice versa, for memory and recognition. In this review these problems are discussed in the context of addressing the stimulating questions: What can neuroscience learn from nonlinear dynamics, and what can nonlinear dynamics learn from neuroscience?en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by NSF Grant No. NSF/EIA-0130708, and Grant No. PHY 0414174; NIH Grant No. 1 R01 NS50945 and Grant No. NS40110; MEC BFI2003-07276, and Fundación BBVA.en_US
dc.format.extent53 pág.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherAmerican Physical Societyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofReviews of Modern Physicsen_US
dc.rights© 2006 American Physical Societyen_US
dc.titleDynamical principles in neuroscienceen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.subject.ecienciaInformáticaes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://journals.aps.org/rmp/abstract/10.1103/RevModPhys.78.1213
dc.identifier.doi10.1103/RevModPhys.78.1213
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage1213
dc.identifier.publicationissue4
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage1265
dc.identifier.publicationvolume78
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.contributor.groupNeurocomputación Biológica (ING EPS-005)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen
dc.authorUAMVarona Martínez, Pablo (258962)
dc.facultadUAMEscuela Politécnica Superior


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record