Cancer and suicidal ideation and behaviours: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Biblos-e Archivo/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Calati, Raffaella
dc.contributor.author Fang, Fang
dc.contributor.author Mostofsky, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.author Shen, Qing
dc.contributor.author DI Mattei, Valentina Elisabetta
dc.contributor.author Garcia-Foncillas, Jesus
dc.contributor.author Baca-Garcia, Enrique
dc.contributor.author Cipriani, Andrea
dc.contributor.author Courtet, Philippe
dc.contributor.other UAM. Departamento de Medicina es_ES
dc.contributor.other UAM. Departamento de Psiquiatría es_ES
dc.contributor.other Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jiménez Díaz (ISS-FJD) es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-18T16:23:33Z
dc.date.available 2019-06-18T16:23:33Z
dc.date.issued 2018-08-10
dc.identifier.citation BMJ Open 8 (2018): e020463 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2044-6055 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10486/687882
dc.description.abstract Introduction Prevalence of suicidal ideation (SI) and behaviours are higher among patients with cancer than general population. No systematic review/meta-analysis investigated this topic; therefore, our aim will be to assess the relationship between cancer and SI and behaviours. Methods We will search PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library databases from their inception until 30 June 2018. Case-control and cohort studies focused on the association between cancer (any type) and suicidal outcomes (suicide, suicide attempt and SI) will be included. Two team members will independently: (A) perform the selection of the included studies and data extraction, with the supervision of a third member in case of discrepancies and (B) assess each study with: (1) Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS); (2) Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement; (3) Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). We will conduct a random-effects meta-analysis. Individual and pooled ORs and associated 95% CIs will be calculated as well as between-study heterogeneity. We will examine the potential for publication bias. If possible, we will explore reasons for potential between-study heterogeneity. Ethics and dissemination This study does not require ethical approval. The study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, will be publicly disseminated and will be the topic of research presentations. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This work is partly supported by the Swedish Cancer Society (grant no: CAN 2014/417), Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare (grant no: 2017-00531), Karolinska Institutet (Senior Researcher Award and Strategic Research Area in Epidemiology Award). en_US
dc.format.extent 5 pag. es_ES
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso eng en
dc.publisher BMJ en_US
dc.relation.ispartof BMJ Open en_US
dc.rights © 2018 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) es_ES
dc.subject.other Cancer en_US
dc.subject.other Epidemiology en_US
dc.subject.other Meta-analysis en_US
dc.subject.other Systematic review en_US
dc.title Cancer and suicidal ideation and behaviours: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis en_US
dc.type article en
dc.subject.eciencia Medicina es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020463 es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020463 es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage e020463-1 es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationissue 8 es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage e020463-5 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion en
dc.rights.cc Reconocimiento – NoComercial es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights openAccess en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record