Mañana, JUEVES, 24 DE ABRIL, el sistema se apagará debido a tareas habituales de mantenimiento a partir de las 9 de la mañana. Lamentamos las molestias.
Aggregating judgments by the majority method
Autor (es)
García Bermejo Ochoa, Juan CarlosEntidad
UAM. Departamento de Análisis Económico, Teoría Económica e Historia EconómicaEditor
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Departamento de Análisis Económico, Teoría Económica e Historia EconómicaFecha de edición
2006Serie/Núm.
Economic analysis working papers series. 10/2006ISSN
1885-6888Materias
Judgement aggregation; Majority method; Logical constraints on judgment aggregation; Discursive dilemma; EconomíaResumen
Judgement aggregation has been receiving increasing attention over recent years.
Some typical impossibility results have been proved, about majority and other
similar aggregation methods. Those results depend essentially on certain logical
constraints borrowed from standard two- valued deductive logic. Nevertheless, the
adequacy of these constraints is doubtful. In this paper, we show that by
weakening the consistency conditions in a plausible way, such impossibility
theorems can be reversed. We also show that the formalism habitually employed
in social choice theory may convey a richer setting for analysing this sort of
aggregation.
Lista de ficheros
Google Scholar:García Bermejo Ochoa, Juan Carlos
Lista de colecciones del ítem
Registros relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por título, autor, creador y materia.