Mañana, JUEVES, 24 DE ABRIL, el sistema se apagará debido a tareas habituales de mantenimiento a partir de las 9 de la mañana. Lamentamos las molestias.
Machine Learning Nowcasting of PV Energy Using Satellite Data
Entidad
UAM. Departamento de Ingeniería InformáticaEditor
Springer NatureFecha de edición
2019-01-05Cita
10.1007/s11063-018-09969-1
Neural Processing Letters 52.1 (2020): 97-115
ISSN
1370-4621 (print); 1573-773X (online)DOI
10.1007/s11063-018-09969-1Financiado por
With partial support from Spain’s Grants TIN2013-42351-P, TIN2016-76406-P, TIN2015-70308-REDT and S2013/ICE-2845 CASI-CAM-CM. Work supported also by project FACIL–Ayudas Fundación BBVA a Equipos de Investigación Científica 2016, and the UAM–ADIC Chair for Data Science and Machine Learning. The second author was also supported by the FPU–MEC Grant AP-2012-5163. We thank Red Eléctrica de España for useful discussions and making available PV energy data and gratefully acknowledge the use of the facilities of Centro de Computación Científica (CCC) at UAMProyecto
Gobierno de España. TIN2013-42351-P; Gobierno de España. TIN2016-76406-P; Gobierno de España. TIN2015-70308-REDT; Comunidad de Madrid. S2013/ICE-2845/CASI-CAMVersión del editor
http://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-018-09969-1Materias
Clear sky models; EUMETSAT; Lasso; Nowcasting; Photovoltaic energy; Support vector regression; InformáticaNota
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11063-018-09969-1Derechos
© Springer NatureResumen
Satellite-measured radiances are obviously of great interest for photovoltaic (PV) energy prediction. In this work we will use them together with clear sky irradiance estimates for the nowcasting of PV energy productions over peninsular Spain. We will feed them directly into two linear Machine Learning models, Lasso and linear Support Vector Regression (SVR), and two highly non-linear ones, Deep Neural Networks (in particular, Multilayer Perceptrons, MLPs) and Gaussian SVRs. We shall also use a simple clear sky-based persistence model for benchmarking purposes. We consider prediction horizons of up to 6 h, with Gaussian SVR being statistically better than the other models at each horizon, since its errors increase slowly with time (with an average of 1.92% for the first three horizons and of 2.89% for the last three). MLPs performance is close to that of the Gaussian SVR for the longer horizons (with an average of 3.1%) but less so at the initial ones (average of 2.26%), being nevertheless significantly better than the linear models. As it could be expected, linear models give weaker results (in the initial horizons, Lasso and linear SVR have already an error of 3.21% and 3.46%, respectively), but we will take advantage of the spatial sparsity provided by Lasso to try to identify the concrete areas with a larger influence on PV energy nowcasts
Lista de ficheros
Google Scholar:Catalina Feliu, Alejandro
-
Torres-Barrán, Alberto
-
Alaiz Gudín, Carlos María
-
Dorronsoro Ibero, José Ramón
Lista de colecciones del ítem
Registros relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por título, autor, creador y materia.