Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMonarca, Héctor  es_ES
dc.contributor.authorFernández González, Noelia es_ES
dc.contributor.authorMéndez Núñez, Ángel es_ES
dc.contributor.otherUAM. Departamento de Pedagogíaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-24T14:55:34Z
dc.date.available2022-06-24T14:55:34Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-13
dc.identifier.citationFilosofija-Sociologija 32.1 (2021):42-50es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0235-7186 (Print)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2424-4546 (Online)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10486/702796en_US
dc.descriptionThis article has been prepared in the frame of the Research-Review Project 'Profesionalización Docente: Discursos, políticas y prácticas. Nuevos enfoques y propuestas' which has been submitted under the 2020 call for R&D&I projects of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation 'Programa Estatal de Generación de Conocimiento y Fortalecimiento Científico y Tecnológico del Sistema de I+D+i, del Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020'en_US
dc.description.abstractThis article offers an epistemological framework to analyse how hegemony is constructed in the field of education, as part of current debates in the social sciences on the aperture and closure of the social. Our central thesis is that, beyond the post-structuralist tendency that dominates these debates, we must reconsider the potential effects of its theoretical assumptions on the social world, i.e. not only on its representation, but also on its structures, subjects, objects, and phenomena in general. To that end, we will analyse by the way of example the discourses on quality of education, core in education policies since 1980s, from this epistemological framework. Moreover, this type of discourses also allowed the instituted powers to connect the traditional forms of production and reproduction of ‘the social’ to new forms that help consolidate its hegemony by improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the ways to produce and accumulate capital, and thus legitimize them. Indeed, as a framework, quality had and still has a totalizing effect on the hegemonic re-adjustment and re-working of capitalism that began in the late 1970sen_US
dc.format.extent10 págs.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLithuanian Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFilosofija, Sociologijaen_US
dc.rightsCopyright Lithuanian Academy of Sciences 2021en_US
dc.subject.othersocial scienceen_US
dc.subject.otherpolitical theoryen_US
dc.subject.othersocial orderen_US
dc.subject.otherregimes of truthen_US
dc.subject.othersymbolic disputesen_US
dc.subject.othereducational policiesen_US
dc.titleSocial Order, Regimes of Truth and Symbolic Disputes: A Framework to Analyse Educational Policiesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.subject.ecienciaEducaciónes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v32i1.4378en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.6001/fil-soc.v32i1.4378es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage42es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationissue1es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage50es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationvolume32es_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.cc
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.facultadUAMFacultad de Formación de Profesorado y Educaciónes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record