Efficacy of a strategy for implementing a guideline for the control of cardiovascular risk in a primary healthcare setting: The SIRVA2 study a controlled, blinded community intervention trial randomised by clusters
10.1186/1471-2296-12-21BMC Family Practice 12 (2011): 21
Funded byFunding for the trial was provided by the Plan Nacional de Investigación Científica, Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica (I+D+I). Instituto de Salud Carlos III - Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria. Expediente N° 031216
SubjectsCardiovascular disease; Clinical practice guidelines; Cluster analysis; Primary healthcare; Randomised clinical trial; Medicina
Rights© 2011 Rodríguez-Salvanés et al.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional.
This work describes the methodology used to assess a strategy for implementing clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for cardiovascular risk control in a health area of Madrid. Background: The results on clinical practice of introducing CPGs have been little studied in Spain. The strategy used to implement a CPG is known to influence its final use. Strategies based on the involvement of opinion leaders and that are easily executed appear to be among the most successful. Aim: The main aim of the present work was to compare the effectiveness of two strategies for implementing a CPG designed to reduce cardiovascular risk in the primary healthcare setting, measured in terms of improvements in the recording of calculated cardiovascular risk or specific risk factors in patients’ medical records, the control of cardiovascular risk factors, and the incidence of cardiovascular events. Methods: This study involved a controlled, blinded community intervention in which the 21 health centres of the Number 2 Health Area of Madrid were randomly assigned by clusters to be involved in either a proposed CPG implementation strategy to reduce cardiovascular risk, or the normal dissemination strategy. The study subjects were patients ≥ 45 years of age whose health cards showed them to belong to the studied health area. The main variable examined was the proportion of patients whose medical histories included the calculation of their cardiovascular risk or that explicitly mentioned the presence of variables necessary for its calculation. The sample size was calculated for a comparison of proportions with alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.20, and assuming that the intervention would lead to a 15% increase in the measured variables. Corrections were made for the design effect, assigning a sample size to each cluster proportional to the size of the population served by the corresponding health centre, and assuming losses of 20%. This demanded a final sample size of 620 patients. Data were analysed using summary measures for each cluster, both in making estimates and for hypothesis testing. Analysis of the variables was made on an intention-to-treat basis
Google Scholar:Rodríguez-Salvanés, Francisco J. - Novella, Blanca - Fernández Luque, María Jesús - Sanchez-Gámez, L. M. - Ruiz Díaz, Lourdes - Sánchez-Alcalde, Rosa - Sierra-García, Belén - Mayayo-Vicente, Soledad - Ruiz-Lápez, Marta - Loeches, Pilar - López-Gánzalez, Javier - Gonzalez-Gamarra, Amelia
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
A cluster-randomised clinical trial comparing two cardiovascular health education strategies in a child population: The Savinghearts project Sánchez-Gómez, Luis María; Fernández Luque, María Jesús; Ruiz Díaz, Lourdes; Sánchez-Alcalde, Rosa; Sierra-García, Belén; Mayayo-Vicente, Soledad; Ruiz-López, Marta; Loeches-Belinchón, Pilar; López-Gónzález, Javier; González-Gamarra, Amelia; Gallego Arenas, Angela; Cubillo-Serna, Ana; Gil-Juberias, Gema; Pérez-Cayuela, Pilar; Arana Cañedo-Arguelles, Celina; García Pascual, Julia Natividad; Ruiz-Chércoles, Esther; Suárez Fernández, M. Carmen; García-Polo, Iluminada; Abad Pérez, Daniel; Ballesteros-Arribas, Juan Manuel; Izquierdo Martínez, Maravillas; Salvador-Alcaide, Elena; Arribas-Vela, Ana B.; Alonso-Pérez, Juan M.; Veja-Piris, Lorena; Rodríguez-Salvanés, Francisco J.; Novella Arribas, Blanca
Effectiveness of a stepped-care programme of internet-based psychological interventions for healthcare workers with psychological distress: Study protocol for the RESPOND healthcare workers randomised controlled trial Mediavilla Torres, Roberto; McGreevy, Kerry R.; Felez-Nobrega, Mireia; Monistrol-Mula, Anna; Bravo Ortiz, María Fe; Bayón Pérez, Carmen; Rodríguez Vega, Beatriz; Nicaise, Pablo; Delaire, Audrey; Sijbrandij, Marit; Witteveen, Anke B.; Purgato, Marianna; Barbui, Corrado; Tedeschi, Federico; Melchior, Maria; van der Waerden, Judith; McDaid, David; Park, A. La; Kalisch, Raffael; Petri-Romão, Papoula; Underhill, James; Bryant, Richard A.; Haro, Josep Maria; Ayuso Mateos, José Luis; RESPOND Consortium
A randomized multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of melatonin in the prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in high-risk contacts (MeCOVID Trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial García García, Irene; Rodríguez-Rubio, Miguel; Rodríguez Mariblanca, Amelia; Martínez de Soto, Lucía; Díaz García, Lucía; Monserrat Villatoro, Jaime; Queiruga Parada, Javier; Seco Meseguer, Enrique; Rosales, María J.; González, Juan; Arribas, José R.; Carcas Sansuán, Antonio Javier; Oliva Senovilla, Pedro de la; Borobia Pérez, Alberto M.