Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMathis, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorKhanlari, Bettina
dc.contributor.authorPulido, Federico
dc.contributor.authorSchechter, Martin T.
dc.contributor.authorNegredo, Eugènia
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Mark Richard
dc.contributor.authorVernazza, Pietro Luigi
dc.contributor.authorCahn, Pedro E.
dc.contributor.authorMeynard -, Jean Luc
dc.contributor.authorArribas, José Ramón
dc.contributor.authorBucher, Heíner Claudins
dc.contributor.otherUAM. Departamento de Medicinaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-13T12:24:55Z
dc.date.available2015-04-13T12:24:55Z
dc.date.issued2011-07-22
dc.identifier.citationPlos One 6.7 (2011): e22003en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203 (online)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10486/665053
dc.description.abstractBackground: The unparalleled success of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is based on the combination of three drugs from two classes. There is insufficient evidence whether simplification to ritonavir boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) monotherapy in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients is effective and safe to reduce cART side effects and costs. Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, conference proceedings and trial registries to identify all randomised controlled trials comparing PI/r monotherapy to cART in suppressed patients. We calculated in an intention to treat (loss-of follow-up, discontinuation of assigned drugs equals failure) and per-protocol analysis (exclusion of protocol violators following randomisation) and based on three different definitions for virological failure pooled risk ratios for remaining virologically suppressed. Findings: We identified 10 trials comparing 3 different PIs with cART based on a PI/r plus 2 reverse transcriptase inhibitors in 1189 patients. With the most conservative approach (viral load <50 copies/ml on two consecutive measurements), the risk ratios for viral suppression at 48 weeks of PI/r monotherapy compared to cART were in the ITT analysis 0.94 8 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.00) p = 0.06; risk difference -0.06 (95%CI -0.11 to 0) p = 0.05, p for heterogeneity = 0.08, I 2 = 43.1%) and in the PP analysis 0.93 ((95%CI 0.90 to 0.97) p<0.001; risk difference -0.07 (95%CI -0.10 to -0.03) p<0.001, p for heterogeneity = 0.44, I 2 = 0%). Reintroduction of cART in 44 patients with virological failure led in 93% to de-novo viral suppression. Interpretation: Virologically well suppressed HIV-infected patients have a lower chance to maintain viral suppression when switching from cART to PI/r monotherapy. Failing patients achieve high rates of de-novo viral suppression following reintroduction of reverse transcriptase inhibitorsen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipHeiner C. Bucher is supported by grants from santésuisse, the Gottfried and Julia Bangerter-Rhyner-Foundation. Abbott Switzerland supported the Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics with an unrestricted grant for clinical HIV researchen_US
dc.format.extent10 pag.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPlos Oneen_US
dc.rights© 2011 Mathis et al.es_ES
dc.subject.otherDrug Therapyen_US
dc.subject.otherHIV Infectionsen_US
dc.subject.otherMaintenance Chemotherapyen_US
dc.subject.otherRisk Factorsen_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Trials as Topicen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of protease inhibitor monotherapy versus combination antiretroviral maintenance therapy: A meta-analysisen_US
dc.typearticleen
dc.subject.ecienciaMedicinaes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0022003es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpagee22003es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationissue7es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationlastpagee22003es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationvolume6es_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.rights.ccReconocimientoes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen
dc.facultadUAMFacultad de Medicina


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record