Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBorondo, J.
dc.contributor.authorBorondo, Florentino 
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Sickert, C.
dc.contributor.authorHidalgo, C. A.
dc.contributor.otherUAM. Departamento de Químicaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-11T12:02:28Z
dc.date.available2015-11-11T12:02:28Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-21
dc.identifier.citationScientific Reports 4 (2014): 3784en_US
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10486/668779
dc.description.abstractA system is said to be meritocratic if the compensation and power available to individuals is determined by their abilities and merits. A system is topocratic if the compensation and power available to an individual is determined primarily by her position in a network. Here we introduce a model that is perfectly meritocratic for fully connected networks but that becomes topocratic for sparse networks-like the ones in society. In the model, individuals produce and sell content, but also distribute the content produced by others when they belong to the shortest path connecting a buyer and a seller. The production and distribution of content defines two channels of compensation: a meritocratic channel, where individuals are compensated for the content they produce, and a topocratic channel, where individual compensation is based on the number of shortest paths that go through them in the network. We solve the model analytically and show that the distribution of payoffs is meritocratic only if the average degree of the nodes is larger than a root of the total number of nodes. We conclude that, in the light of this model, the sparsity and structure of networks represents a fundamental constraint to the meritocracy of societiesen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSupport from the MIT Media Lab Consortia, Fundación Caja Madrid (Spain), UAM-Santander (Spain) and CONICYT grants: Anillo en Complejidad Social SOC-1101 and Fondecyt 1110351 is gratefully acknowledgeden_US
dc.format.extent7 pag.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reportsen_US
dc.subject.otherComplex networksen_US
dc.subject.otherPhysicsen_US
dc.titleTo each according to its degree: The meritocracy and topocracy of embedded marketsen_US
dc.typearticleen
dc.subject.ecienciaQuímicaes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep03784es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/srep03784es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage3784es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage3784es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationvolume4es_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.rights.ccReconocimiento – NoComercial – SinObraDerivadaes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen
dc.authorUAMBorondo, Florentino (260097)
dc.facultadUAMFacultad de Ciencias
dc.institutoUAMInstituto de Ciencias Matemáticas (ICMAT)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record