Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartín Navarro, Juan
dc.contributor.authorEsteras, Raquel
dc.contributor.authorCastillo, Emeralda
dc.contributor.authorCarriazo, Sol
dc.contributor.authorFernández Prado, Raúl
dc.contributor.authorGracia Iguacel, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorMas Fontao, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz Arduán, Alberto 
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Parra, Emilio
dc.contributor.otherUAM. Departamento de Medicinaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T13:03:11Z
dc.date.available2020-03-16T13:03:11Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-10
dc.identifier.citationKidney Bood Press Res 44 (2019): 907-914en_US
dc.identifier.issn1420-4096 (print)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1423-0143 (online)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10486/690570
dc.description.abstractBackground: Reactions to dialyzers used in dialysis have been reported more frequently in recent years. Evidence, however, shows that the reaction rate has remained stable for years. Summary: One explanation for the apparent increase in publication frequency could be the lack of knowledge that dialyzer reactions may well occur with biocompatible membranes. Studies showed that the cause of these reactions is very diverse and varied, involving multiple materials. However, polyvinylpyrrolidone continues to be the main suspect, but without conclusive results. There are no differences between the different fibers, and although polysulfone is the most described, it is also the most used. Key Messages: The change to cellulose triacetate continues to be the most appropriate form of treatment. The classification of these reactions into type A and B complicates the diagnosis, and its true usefulness is in doubten_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research presented in this article is supported by the grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and European Regional Development Funds (ERDF/FEDER) through ISCIII/FIS grants PI16/01298, PI17/01495, CIBERDEM and REDINREN RD016/0019 and through the Madrid Renal Society (SOMANE) grantsen_US
dc.format.extent8 págs.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherKarger Publishers Open Accessen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKidney and Blood Pressure Researchen_US
dc.rights© 2019 The Author(s)es_ES
dc.subject.otherhemodialysisen_US
dc.subject.otherallergyen_US
dc.subject.otherhypersensibilityen_US
dc.subject.othersynthetic membranesen_US
dc.titleReactions to synthetic membranes dialyzers: Is there an increase in incidence?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.subject.ecienciaMedicinaes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1159/000501035es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000501035es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage907es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationissue44es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage914es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDGobierno de España. PI16/01298es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDGobierno de España. PI17/01495es_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.rights.ccReconocimiento – NoComercial – SinObraDerivadaes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.authorUAMGracia Iguacel, Carolina Marta (279745)
dc.authorUAMOrtiz Arduan, Alberto (261886)
dc.authorUAMGonzález Parra, Emilio José (262320)
dc.facultadUAMFacultad de Medicina
dc.institutoUAMInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jiménez Díaz (ISS-FJD)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record