Biomarkers of basal cell carcinoma resistance to methyl-aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy
Entity
UAM. Departamento de BiologíaPublisher
Public Library of ScienceDate
2019-04-01Citation
10.1371/journal.pone.0215537
PLoS ONE 14.4 (2019): e0215537
ISSN
1932-6203DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0215537Funded by
This project received support from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III and Fondos Feder Europeos, MINECO (FIS PI15/00974). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscriptProject
Gobierno de España. FIS PI15/00974Editor's Version
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215537Subjects
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC); Methyl-aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT); Biología y Biomedicina / BiologíaRights
© 2019 Gracia-Cazaña et alAbstract
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Background Methyl-aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) is an excellent option for the treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). However, up to 25% of cases are resistant to this treatment modality. Objective The aim of this study was to identify potential biomarkers of BCC response to MAL-PDT. Material and methods Clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical (p53, Ki-67, CD-31, COX2, β-catenin, EGFR, and survivin) variables were analyzed in a retrospective study of consecutive BCC patients treated with MAL-PDT at the San Jorge Hospital, Huesca, Spain between January 2006 and December 2015. To deepen on these markers, the effects on p53 and cyclin D1 expression, in vitro response to MAL-PDT of 2 murine BCC cell lines (ASZ and BSZ), was also evaluated. Results The retrospective study examined the response to MAL-PDT of 390 BCCs from 182 patients. The overall clinical response rate was 82.8%, with a mean follow-up time of 35.96 months (SD = 23.46). Immunohistochemistry revealed positive p53 in 84.6% of responders but only 15.4% of nonresponsive tumors (p = 0.011). Tumors with increased peripheral palisading of basal cell islands to immunostaining β-catenin responded poorly to PDT (p = 0.01). In line with our findings in patients, in vitro studies revealed a better response to PDT in the p53-positive ASZ cell line than the p53-negative BSZ cell line (p<0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the following variables were significantly associated with response to PDT: age, nBCC, presence of peritumoral inflammatory infiltrate, and p53 immunopositivity. Patients with positive p53 immunostaining were 68.54 times more likely to achieve cure than p53-negative patients (CI95% 2.94–159.8) Conclusion Our finding suggest that certain clinicopathological and immunohistochemical variables, particularly p53 expression, may serve as indicators of BCC response to MAL-PDT, and thus facilitate the selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from this therapy
Files in this item
Google Scholar:Gracia-Cazaña, Tamara
-
Mascaraque, Marta
-
Lucena, Silvia Rocío
-
Vera-Álvarez, Jesús
-
González, Salvador
-
Juarranz de la Fuente, Ángeles
-
Gilaberte, Yolanda
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.