Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZazo, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorArroyo García, Valeria Nantu 
dc.contributor.otherUAM. Departamento de Filosofíaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-03T14:04:02Z
dc.date.available2021-09-03T14:04:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.identifier.citationPhilosophical Readings 13.1 (2021): 16-22en_US
dc.identifier.issn2036-4989es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10486/697339
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines Hegel’s critique of Enlightenment in the work Faith and Knowledge (1802). To that end, we assess the recent work of several historians who study Enlightenment and dissociate it from the French Revolution and describe the tipology (French, British, German) of the European, Cosmopolitan Enlightenment.en_US
dc.format.extent7 pag.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isospaen_US
dc.publisherPhilosophical Readings, Italyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophical Readingsen_US
dc.subject.otherEnlightenmenten_US
dc.subject.otherEuropeen_US
dc.subject.otherFaith and Knowledgeen_US
dc.subject.otherHegelen_US
dc.subject.otherreasonen_US
dc.title“El negativo proceder de la Ilustración”. Razones historiográficas de la crítica hegeliana a la Ilustración en Fe y saberes_ES
dc.typearticleen
dc.subject.ecienciaFilosofíaes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4071900es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.5281/zenodo.4071900es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage16es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationissue1es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage22es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationvolume13es_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.rights.ccReconocimiento – NoComercial – CompartirIguales_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.authorUAMZazo Jiménez, Eduardo (264607)
dc.authorUAMArroyo García, Valeria Nantu (278915)
dc.facultadUAMFacultad de Filosofía y Letras


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record